Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, with a global score of 84.2 against 82.2. The iPhone XS is a thinner and just a little lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. The iPhone XS has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a quite smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The iPhone XS counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone XS features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a camera with much less MP, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.