Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 general score. The Apple iPhone XS body is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although both were only released with a few months difference. The Apple iPhone XS features just a bit better performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XS counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone XS, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.