Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, having an 84.2 score against 76.6. Despite of the fact the Apple iPhone XS is older and a bit heavier than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's design is still a little bit thinner. The Apple iPhone XS has a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little bit more pixels per display inch.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The iPhone XS counts with a little better performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has 2 lesser and slower processing cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XS takes a little bit better photographs and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much tinier sensor giving a way lower image quality, a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better video definition.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.