Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 20's 77.8 general score. The Apple iPhone XS is an older cellphone than ZTE Axon 20, but Apple was able to build it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Apple iPhone XS counts with a much better screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
Apple iPhone XS has a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The ZTE Axon 20 captures greater photos and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor.
The ZTE Axon 20 has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. ZTE Axon 20 features a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 59 percent bigger battery size.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as ZTE Axon 20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy ZTE Axon 20, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.