Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, having a global score of 84.2 against 78.1. IPhone XS is an extremely older phone than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but Apple could make it a little bit lighter and a little thinner. The iPhone XS counts with a little better processing power than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone XS has a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display density and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a lot better video resolution, a much more MP back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh.
The iPhone XS costs more than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.