Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | ZTE |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-02-20 | 2018-03-30 |
| 4.92 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 233 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.83 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.12 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go has a global score of 50.8, which is slightly better than ARCHOS 40b Titanium's 46.4 global score. ZTE Tempo Go is a notably newer and much lighter cellphone than the ARCHOS 40b Titanium, although it's somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Tempo Go has newer 8.1 Oreo version and ARCHOS 40b Titanium has Android 4.2.2.
ARCHOS 40b Titanium has a sharper screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 800 x 480, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. ARCHOS 40b Titanium counts with a bit better performance than ZTE Tempo Go, because although it has 512 MB less RAM and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
ZTE Tempo Go has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than ARCHOS 40b Titanium, because it has 4 GB more internal storage capacity. ZTE Tempo Go features a way better battery performance than ARCHOS 40b Titanium, because it has a 2200mAh battery size instead of 1400mAh. The ZTE Tempo Go has just a bit better camera than ARCHOS 40b Titanium. Both have a 5 mega pixels camera.
ZTE Tempo Go not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.