Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.87 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is way better than the ARCHOS 50b Platinum's score of 48.8. The LG V35 ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the ARCHOS 50b Platinum. LG V35 ThinQ has a superior performance than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter display than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a much better display pixels density, a larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a 74 percent larger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better camera than ARCHOS 50b Platinum, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a way better video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the ARCHOS 50b Platinum, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.