Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 48.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2014-02-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.72 x 3.57 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 229 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is a lot better than the ARCHOS 64 Xenon's global score of 48.5. Even when Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and ARCHOS 64 Xenon were released with only 6 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the newer 5.0 version and ARCHOS 64 Xenon has Android 4.2 version, giving you a couple additional features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a superior processing power than ARCHOS 64 Xenon, because it has more cpu cores, a higher amount of RAM and a graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better looking display than ARCHOS 64 Xenon, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Galaxy Note 3 captures a lot better videos and photos than ARCHOS 64 Xenon, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than ARCHOS 64 Xenon, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little longer battery life than ARCHOS 64 Xenon, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the ARCHOS 64 Xenon, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.