Compare phones
Asus PadFone
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 66.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 4.0.3 | -- |
| 2011-06-01 | 2017-06-22 |
| 5.04 x 2.57 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 373 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E4 is a little bit better than Asus PadFone, with a general score of 66.5 against 60.8. Moto E4's design is newer, but heavier and a little thicker than the Asus PadFone. Asus PadFone features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto E4, although it has a lot worse 960 x 540 resolution, a bit smaller display and a little bit inferior pixels quantity per display inch.
The Asus PadFone features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto E4, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. Asus PadFone has a much greater memory for games and applications than Moto E4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 32 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Moto E4 features a superior battery life than Asus PadFone, because it has an 84% bigger battery capacity. Moto E4 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Asus PadFone. They have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rates, the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Moto E4 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.