Compare phones
Asus PadFone
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 66.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Nokia |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-06-01 | 2019-01-25 |
| 5.04 x 2.57 x 0.36 inches | 6.38 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 250.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.02 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 373 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 Plus has a score of 66.4, which is a bit better than the Asus PadFone's general score of 60.8. Nokia 3.1 Plus's body is incredibly newer and a little thinner, but heavier than Asus PadFone. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 3.1 Plus has newer 9.0 Pie version and Asus PadFone has Android 4.0.3 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Asus PadFone has just a bit better display than Nokia 3.1 Plus, although it has a way smaller screen, a much lower 960 x 540 resolution and a quite lower display density. Nokia 3.1 Plus features just a little better performance than Asus PadFone, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Nokia 3.1 Plus takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Asus PadFone, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 3.1 Plus also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Asus PadFone features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 3.1 Plus, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 224 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 3.1 Plus has a much better battery life than Asus PadFone, because it has a 130 percent greater battery capacity.
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.