Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black glare | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a general score of 87.4, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition's body is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it is extremely heavier and a lot thicker.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and way less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display. The Moto Z Force features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has just a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition shoots greater videos and photos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.