Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-23 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black glare | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having an 87.4 score against 76.4. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition body is way newer, but heavier and incredibly thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lot worse pixels number per inch in the display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a larger display.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition captures way better photos and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a much better resolution back facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.