Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black glare | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has an overall score of 87.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A51's 85.5 global score. Even being the best we compare here, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition design is a lot heavier and much thicker than Galaxy A51. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has the older 10 version while Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy A51 has just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a much better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a larger aperture for better images in low-light environments, a lot higher resolution back camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.