Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-23 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black glare | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, getting an 88.1 score against 87.4. The Galaxy F62 is a a little thinner and a little lighter device than the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, even though both of them were released only 7 months apart. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a much brighter screen. The Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Galaxy F62 has superior battery lifetime than Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition, because it has a 17 percent greater battery size. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution camera, a same size back camera sensor and a same size aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.