Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-23 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black glare | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a score of 86.3, which is better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. Asus ROG Phone 3 is a way newer cellphone than HTC One M9, although it is a little thicker and way heavier. HTC One M9 has a bit faster processor than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processor.
HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better screen than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels amount in each display inch. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features much more storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Asus ROG Phone 3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures, a way higher video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos. The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.