Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black glare | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Asus ROG Phone 3's design is extremely newer, but extremely thicker and a lot heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force. Asus ROG Phone 3 features a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with just a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot lower screen density, it also counts with a larger screen. Moto Z Force counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Asus ROG Phone 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same aperture, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way better resolution back camera. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a very superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.