Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2020-07-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black glare | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 3's 86.3 general score. The Galaxy A52 is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than Asus ROG Phone 3, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Asus ROG Phone 3 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, a same size camera sensor and a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.