Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black glare | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Although the Asus ROG Phone 3 and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 4 months apart, the Asus ROG Phone 3 is just a little lighter and incredibly thinner. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Asus ROG Phone 3 both have very similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera, a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way better video definition. Asus ROG Phone 3 has improved battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.