Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Space Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 6D is just a bit better than the HTC One M9, with a general score of 79.8 against 77.7. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ROG Phone 6D has the newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. Asus ROG Phone 6D is a way newer device than HTC One M9, although it's notably heavier and just a little bit thicker.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better display than Asus ROG Phone 6D, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display density. Asus ROG Phone 6D has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The HTC One M9 features a very superior processing unit than Asus ROG Phone 6D, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. The Asus ROG Phone 6D has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Asus ROG Phone 6D captures much better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.