Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Space Gray | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Asus ROG Phone 6D, with a global score of 81 against 79.8. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an older cellphone than the Asus ROG Phone 6D, but Samsung managed to make it a bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Asus ROG Phone 6D has Android 12.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much more powerful processor than Asus ROG Phone 6D, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2448 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D has a superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Asus ROG Phone 6D captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a lot better video definition and a way better 50 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.