Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-19 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Space Gray | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, with an 87.7 score against 83.2. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has Android 12.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a brighter display than Galaxy M51, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2448 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a little bit greater pixel amount per inch in the display. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a way better processing power than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
The Galaxy M51 counts with greater battery lifetime than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.