Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Space Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a general score of 83.2 against 80.4. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate body is a lot newer, but way thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a really superior performance than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2448 resolution and a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an 88 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.