Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Space Gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate's 83.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's body is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it was released 3 years before. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 12 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2448 resolution and a little worse display density, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.