Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Space Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, having a general score of 94.6 against 83.2. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is much thinner than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it is somewhat heavier and was released 2 years before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has Android 12.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2448 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior processing unit than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs, a much more megapixels camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.