Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro's 74.2 general score. Galaxy A50 features an incredibly better looking display than Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen. The Galaxy A50 features a very superior hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro has much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy A50, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5800mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.