Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| 2018-10-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone has a general score of 77.1, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The Asus ROG Phone construction is newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Asus ROG Phone counts with a slightly better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels count per inch in the screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Asus ROG Phone features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone has a little faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a larger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Asus ROG Phone counts with improved battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC U Ultra, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC U Ultra. If you want to save some money, you can get HTC U Ultra, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.