Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| 2018-10-29 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a general score of 77.6, which is slightly better than Asus ROG Phone's score of 77.1. The HTC U11 body is lighter and a little thinner than the Asus ROG Phone, even though it was released about a year before. The HTC U11 counts with just a bit better looking display than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher display density.
Asus ROG Phone features just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Asus ROG Phone features longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity. HTC U11 takes way better pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor and the same (4K) video definition, the HTC U11 also counts with a bigger aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the HTC U11 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.