Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a 77.1 score against 76.1. The Asus ROG Phone body is somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's a little bit heavier and was released only 18 months before. Asus ROG Phone has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Asus ROG Phone has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen density. The Moto G Power takes way better photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G Power counts with longer battery duration than Asus ROG Phone, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.