Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a 77.1 score against 75.8. Asus ROG Phone's design is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it's heavier and thicker. Asus ROG Phone features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z Force and Asus ROG Phone both count with really similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel number per inch in the screen. Moto Z Force captures much better photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone, although it has worse video frame rate, they both have the same video quality and the same aperture.
The Asus ROG Phone features a very superior memory for applications and games than Moto Z Force, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone features a bit better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.