Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone has a score of 77.1, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Asus ROG Phone is an older device than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's a bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better processing unit than Asus ROG Phone, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory.
The Asus ROG Phone features a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixels amount per inch in the screen. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor, a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Asus ROG Phone has much more storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features improved battery duration than Asus ROG Phone, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Asus ROG Phone, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.