Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the Asus ROG Phone's general score of 77.1. Samsung Galaxy A51's body is newer, a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Asus ROG Phone. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ROG Phone has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a just a little worse pixel amount per display inch, a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution. Asus ROG Phone has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A51 has a very superior camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 and Asus ROG Phone count with really similar battery durations.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.