Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| 2018-10-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a score of 77.1 against 75.8. Asus ROG Phone's construction is much newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also a little heavier. Asus ROG Phone has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a little bit better looking screen than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite darker screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active captures much clearer pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active and Asus ROG Phone both feature very similar batteries duration.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.