Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-10-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.63 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone, getting an 80.1 score against 77.1. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is newer than the Asus ROG Phone's, but it's thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro captures way better pictures and videos than Asus ROG Phone, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a bigger camera aperture. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro costs a bit more than the Asus ROG Phone, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.