Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone, getting a overall score of 81 against 77.1. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and a little heavier than Asus ROG Phone. The Asus ROG Phone has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Asus ROG Phone also has a greater amount of RAM.
Asus ROG Phone counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a quite lower pixel density, a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution. Asus ROG Phone has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little longer battery performance than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor giving a much worse image quality and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.