Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-03-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.90 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue | -- |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, with a 90.7 score against 76.1. Although Galaxy A52 is older than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, it's design is lighter and just a little thinner. Galaxy A52 features a much more powerful CPU than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra also counts with a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 50 MP resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has better battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.