Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-03-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.90 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's score of 76.1. Galaxy Z Flip's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a much better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better hardware performance than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's one, they have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.