Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, getting a global score of 90.1 against 77.5. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is way newer than the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe's, but it is heavier and way thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a larger display, a much better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures greater pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, better 60 fps video frame rate and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe counts with more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.