Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2024-08-29 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, with a global score of 81.9 against 73.3. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is extremely newer and incredibly lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, but it is thicker. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the previous 14 version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1256 x 2760 resolution. Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a back camera with much more MP and better video frame rate.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.