Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-04-16 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, having a 76.1 score against 73.3. The Moto G Power design is newer and lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, but it's notably thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G Power has an older 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a little bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. The Moto G Power has a little bit better looking display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels.
The Moto G Power features a camera that's just as good as the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra one, because although the Moto G Power has a much less MP resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photography. Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has a slightly bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 200 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G Power has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.