Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2021-11-18 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, with a overall score of 86.2 against 73.3. These phones have Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Even though Moto G200 5G is much thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, it's lighter and noticeably newer.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Moto G200 5G also has a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a just a little greater pixels count in each display inch. Moto G200 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra also has an external memory slot that holds up to 200 GB. The Moto G200 5G captures much better videos and photos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality, the Moto G200 5G also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture.
The Moto G200 5G has just a little bit longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.