Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-07-12 | 2016-09-01 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, with a 75.8 score against 73.3. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Even though Moto Z Force and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra were only released with a couple of months difference, Moto Z Force's construction is a little thicker but also notably lighter than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra.
Moto Z Force counts with a better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater pixel number per screen inch. The Moto Z Force counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, although it has 4 less CPU cores (but faster), they both have the same RAM amount. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. The Moto Z Force has a camera that's very similar to Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's camera, because although the Moto Z Force has a lower (4K) video definition and a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.