Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2019-12-04 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, getting a 79.8 score against 73.3. The Motorola One Hyper is a much newer and lighter device than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, although it's noticeably thicker. These phones use Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better looking screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Motorola One Hyper has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper takes much better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.