Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's 73.3 overall score. The Motorola razr (2020) body is notably newer and somewhat lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, but it's thicker. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) features a superior camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 64% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.