Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2024-03-11 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.86 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, having a 79.4 score against 73.3. The Galaxy A35 5G body is extremely newer and lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, although it is also thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a bit sharper display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit higher pixels quantity per display inch. Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.