Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's global score of 73.3. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is incredibly newer and noticeably lighter, but just a little thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid display than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has a back-facing camera with a better 25 megapixels resolution, higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Galaxy A50 has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 15% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.