Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, with a overall score of 90.8 against 73.3. Galaxy A51 5G's body is notably newer and somewhat lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, but it is also a lot thicker. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G captures better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have a F2 aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has higher 30 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has more memory capacity for games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.