Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-12 | 2021-03-17 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, getting a 90.7 score against 73.3. Samsung Galaxy A52's design is notably newer and somewhat lighter than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra's, although it is also thicker. Galaxy A52 features a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite better pixel count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A52 has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 2% bigger battery size. The Galaxy A52 shoots much better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has better video frame rate, a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations and a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.