Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-07-12 | 2019-03-07 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is much better than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, having an 82.4 score against 73.3. Samsung Galaxy M30's construction is extremely newer and incredibly lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow, so it provides you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy M30 features a little sharper screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy M30 has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a much better 23 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features just a bit better battery performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a 9% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.