Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, getting a 98.9 score against 73.3. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is way newer and somewhat lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger display and a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better performing processor than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.