Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 7.34 x 3.70 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.22 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.86 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, with a overall score of 94.8 against 73.3. The Galaxy S20 body is noticeably newer and extremely lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version and Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 has a sharper screen than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S20 captures a bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy S20 has a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Asus ZenFone 3 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.